UmmahAPI vs Aladhan: Which Islamic API Should You Use?
Both are free. Both work well. They are not actually competing for the same job. Aladhan is a prayer times specialist. UmmahAPI is an all in one Islamic API. Pick by what your app needs, not by which name you recognise.
One sentence answer
If your app only ever shows prayer times, either works. If your app shows prayer times and anything else (Quran, Hadith, Qibla, Hijri, Duas), pick UmmahAPI so you do not have to integrate three providers.
Side by side
| UmmahAPI | Aladhan | |
|---|---|---|
| Prayer times | Yes (22 methods) | Yes (22 methods) |
| Quran (3 scripts, 8 translations) | Yes | No |
| Hadith (36,000 from 10 collections) | Yes | No |
| Tafsir | Yes (3 collections) | No |
| Qibla direction | Yes | Yes |
| Hijri calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Duas | Yes (126) | No |
| 99 Names of Allah | Yes | No |
| Word by word Quran | Yes | No |
| Embeddable widgets | 10 | None |
| Public status page | Yes | No |
| OpenAPI spec | Yes | No |
| Rate limit (no key) | 5,000 / 15 min | Documented limit |
| API key | Optional (free, unlimited) | Not used |
| Free | Yes | Yes |
Prayer times: same call, different style
Both return today's prayer times for a given location. The shapes differ slightly.
UmmahAPI
GET https://ummahapi.com/api/prayer-times?lat=40.71&lng=-74.00&method=NorthAmerica
{
"date": "2026-05-01",
"location": { "timezone": "America/New_York" },
"times": { "fajr": "04:32", "dhuhr": "12:54", ... }
}
Aladhan
GET https://api.aladhan.com/v1/timings?latitude=40.71&longitude=-74.00&method=2
{
"data": {
"timings": { "Fajr": "04:32", "Dhuhr": "12:54", ... },
"meta": { "timezone": "America/New_York" }
}
}
UmmahAPI uses string method names (NorthAmerica) instead of numeric codes (2). Less guessing.
Picking by use case
Mosque website
UmmahAPI. You will probably want prayer times, the Hijri date, a verse of the day, and possibly a Hadith of the day. One API for all four. Use the widgets and you do not need to write any JavaScript.
Standalone prayer times app
Either works. Aladhan has a longer track record. UmmahAPI ships an OpenAPI spec and a public status page if those matter for production.
Quran reader app
UmmahAPI. Aladhan does not have Quran data. UmmahAPI gives you three scripts, eight translations, eight reciters, three Tafsir collections, and search.
Hadith app
UmmahAPI for general use (36,000 hadiths, free, no key). Sunnah.com if you need the most authoritative dataset and can comply with their key terms.
Iftar timer
UmmahAPI. The widget supports data-show="maghrib" for a single prayer view. Aladhan would require building the UI yourself.
Rate limits and reliability
UmmahAPI publishes rate limits clearly: 5,000 requests every 15 minutes without a key, unlimited with a free key, plus a 300 per minute limit on calculation endpoints. A public status page shows uptime.
Aladhan has documented limits and has been around for years with broadly good uptime, but does not publish a status page.
Migrating from Aladhan to UmmahAPI
The change is mostly a rename. Update the URL and the param names.
// Before (Aladhan)
fetch('https://api.aladhan.com/v1/timings?latitude=40.71&longitude=-74&method=2')
// After (UmmahAPI)
fetch('https://ummahapi.com/api/prayer-times?lat=40.71&lng=-74&method=NorthAmerica')
Adjust how you read the response shape (times.fajr vs data.timings.Fajr) and you are done.
Both providers are good. This is not Aladhan slander. They built a solid prayer times API that has helped Muslim developers for years. The point is: pick the tool that matches the shape of your project.
FAQ
Why pick UmmahAPI over Aladhan?
If you need more than prayer times, UmmahAPI bundles nine services and ten widgets in one API. Aladhan is prayer times only.
Is UmmahAPI as reliable as Aladhan?
UmmahAPI publishes a public status page so you can verify uptime instead of trusting a claim. Aladhan does not publish one.
Will my Aladhan code break?
No. Aladhan still works fine. You can run them side by side while you migrate.
HifzMate
MyAzanCast